100 articles from Carbon Brief between April 2011 and October 2011
October 2011
- Lord Lawson: not entitled to his own facts
- Gas prices are to blame for rising energy bills says Ofgem, not green policies
- Arctic sea ice minimum in 2007 “not a one off”
- Fact checking, environmental journalism and summing up on ‘mini’ ice ages
- Mail story on energy price rises ignores the role of spiralling wholesale fuel costs
- Atlantic Bridge and the climate skeptic connection
- The science take: Solar activity and ice ages
- Ice age! How the Daily Express use inverted commas to mangle science
- IPCC models underestimate future sea ice loss – New scientific paper
- NSIDC: Arctic sea ice extent neared record lows during summer 2011
- Global Warming Policy Foundation promotes shale gas on the BBC
- George Osborne jumps on the ‘green bills’ bandwagon
- Carbon Brief The Press Complaints Commission and the Daily Mail
September 2011
- Is there a PR campaign against climate science in the UK?
- Climate Reality check – a glance at the science behind Al Gore’s project
- Christopher Booker uses Times Atlas story for his own purposes
- Harper Collins to “urgently review” maps following more criticism from scientists
- Times Atlas admit a mistake on Greenland press release claim, maintain maps are accurate
- Daily Mail confused over whether ‘green tax’ cost is £85 or £300 as Mail on Sunday uses GWPF £200 figure despite PCC ruling
- Scientists call Times World Atlas Greenland claims ‘incorrect and misleading’
- The new normal
- Arctic sea ice low what does it really mean?
- Disentangling media coverage about Arctic sea ice
- Energy bills, skeptic papers, Arctic sea ice
- Cosmic rays and internet memes
- Poll: the Tea Party and climate change
- Clouds and climate skeptics – new paper critiques ‘flawed’ sceptic study
- Daily Mail prints correction over GWPF green tax claims
- Telegraph £300 energy bill headline makes the usual mistakes
- Hurricane Irene, the Arctic and more on green energy headlines – the last week
- Cool summer
August 2011
- Story of a meme: Chinese and European emissions
- More on ‘Let them eat carbon’
- Maunder minimum, solar activity and the Little Ice Age: new research
- Those Daily Mail figures keep coming whos counting?
- Summer (and winter) reading – ten books about climate change
- What the TaxPayers Alliance and Daily Mail dont tell about their green tax con
- Everything you ever wanted to know about Arctic sea ice (but weren’t enough of a geek to ask)
- Best climate resources on the web
- Essential climate video on US heatwave
- Does climate change cause a drought? Does it cause a famine?
- Factcheck – Ann Widdecombe on climate in the Daily Express
- Polar bear scientist transcript reveals bizarre nature of investigation
- The polar bear transcript: the edited highlights
- Government denies press claims on £200 green tax cost
July 2011
- New satellite data finds the Greenland ice sheet lost mass in the noughties
- New polling examines climate scepticism in detail
- The Mail gives 5 times more space to the Global Warming Policy Foundation than to any other source on climate
- Does Lord Lawson’s think tank ‘cast doubt’ on the science of climate change?
- Hello world!
- BBC Trust on climate: Let’s debate climate policy but reflect the “agreed scientific factbase”
- A thousand pounds on energy bills due to green policies?
- Report into BBC’s science coverage likely to suggest corporation needs to avoid false balance on climate
- Where are the Daily Mail getting their numbers from?
- Chris Huhne on climate and security
- What we know and what we don’t know
- New study suggests oceans are losing the ability to absorb carbon dioxide
- Daily Mail drops GWPF green tax claim
- Factcheck: Christopher Booker and the missing ice age
- Monckton cut off in Oz radio row
- Sulphur cools the planet, Monckton on tour and climate drought questions
- Sulfur emissions may have slowed temperature rise
- OECD to business: Scientific uncertainty is not a reason to ignore climate change
- Mails U-turn coverage of link between extreme weather and climate change
- Scientists go to extremes to understand climate change
June 2011
- Can we have early warning of climate tipping points?
- IPCC SRREN report reveals legitimate issues with the organisation’s communications
- Sunspots, ice ages, and the biggest experiment ever
- Mail fuels fears over energy bills but wheres the research to back them up?
- Is 1.5 degrees a scientifically realistic target?
- Global warming since 1995 statistically significant
- Food, hunger and climate change
- Impacts of a melting cryosphere ice loss around the world
- Daily Mail reprints Lord Turnbull’s scientific errors
- Latest emission figures show world on track for 4 degrees
- Summer comes, weather warms Arctic melts away?
May 2011
- Skeptic shift by Republican hopefuls
- Abraham strikes again
- Climate science communicated; job done? Maybe not.
- David Rose’s climate science – half truths and bias
- Can we trust climate models?
- Lord Turnbull’s GWPF briefing paper ‘The really inconvenient truth’ suffers from basic factual innaccuracies
- A hot April or a cold winter dont tell us much about climate change
- Missing migrants?
- Is the CRU the ‘principal source’ of climate change projections?
- Political tension in the Arctic ratchets up as sea ice melts
- Climate feedbacks explained with added vocoder in science rap video
- Has global warming stopped?
- New book aims to reclaim scientific skepticism
- The science is solid, it is time to move on – the UK government view on climategate
- Lord Monckton in Oz. Again.
- Cutting greenhouse gas emissions is urgent says new Arctic report
- Andy Russell on the Merchants of Doubt
- The Daily Mail’s different views of sea level rise
April 2011
- A ex-climate sceptic and the next 100,000 years of life on earth
- Energy and Environment journal of choice for climate skeptics Analysing the 900+ skeptic papers part III
- Are the British really bored of climate change?
- “I was defeated by facts” How a sceptic changed his mind about climate change
- Three reasons to care about the Arctic
- Using our paper to support skepticism of anthropogenic global warming is misleading. Part II of our analysis of the 900+ climate skeptic papers